(03) 8832 8005

Most Aussie DTC founders treat their product catalogue like a hoarder’s garage. Every SKU launched is a SKU kept. Every “let’s just try one more colour” stays on the site three years later, taking up shelf space, photoshoot budget, ad creative slots, and forecasting brain power that should be going somewhere else.

Then you hit June and the same pattern repeats. Your accountant asks why stock-on-hand is so high. Your 3PL invoices climb. Cash is tight even though revenue is up. You blame Meta, shipping rates, or the AUD. The real culprit is sitting in your Shopify admin: a long tail of SKUs that nobody buys, that no one will ever buy at full price, and that you are still paying to store, insure, photograph, and forecast for.

Here is the math most founders never run. McKinsey research puts the cost of product complexity at roughly USD 50 billion in lost gross profit per year for U.S. food and beverage manufacturers alone. Bain estimates SKU complexity can inflate supply chain costs by up to 25%. In your store, the bottom 50% of SKUs typically generate only 5% of revenue. Half your catalogue is doing one-twentieth of the work. The SKU rationalisation playbook below is the 5-tier audit we run inside eCommerce Circle to find that dead weight, decide what to do with it, and reclaim $50K or more in trapped inventory cash before 30 June.

The Real Cost of SKU Bloat (No One Talks About)

When you ask a founder why they hold 240 SKUs instead of 80, the answer is almost always the same: “Every product earns its keep.” That is rarely true once you actually look at the numbers.

Inventory holding costs in ecommerce run between 20% and 30% of total inventory value per year. For stores under $1M in annual revenue, the high end is more typical: 25 to 30%. That covers warehousing, insurance, shrinkage, capital cost, and obsolescence. If you are sitting on $50,000 in dead stock, you are quietly paying $12,500 a year just to keep it on shelves that could be holding a winner.

The complexity tax is bigger than the storage tax. Forecast accuracy is roughly four times worse at the SKU level than at the category level, which is why your reorders are always slightly wrong. Every extra SKU adds a row to the demand plan, a line on the supplier PO, a tile in the PDP grid, a creative variant in the Meta ad set, and a new edge case for customer service. A 240-SKU catalogue is not twice the work of a 120-SKU catalogue. It is closer to four times the work.

The good news is that the inverse works too. Bain studied a Belgian food category that grew revenue 17% while reducing SKUs by 42%. A Swedish candy category lifted sales 19% with 18% fewer items. Coca-Cola publicly discontinued thousands of SKUs in 2020 and James Quincey credited the simplification with returning the business to revenue growth. Less can absolutely mean more, but only if you do the cuts with a framework rather than vibes.

Shopify ABC analysis report showing 130 C-grade SKUs driving only 5% of revenue
The classic Pareto curve, mapped onto a real Aussie DTC catalogue. 49 A-grade SKUs (20%) drive 80% of revenue. 130 C-grade SKUs (52%) drive 5%.

Tier 1: Run the Shopify ABC Analysis (Your Starting Map)

Shopify has had ABC analysis built into the admin for years and most founders have never opened it. From your admin, go to Analytics, then Reports, then look for “ABC analysis by product” under the Inventory section. If you are on Basic or Lite, the report is gated, so use Mipler, Report Pundit, or Sumtracker from the App Store to get an equivalent view for under $30 a month.

The report classifies every SKU into one of three grades based on revenue contribution over a rolling window. A-grade is the top 80% of revenue, typically 15 to 25% of your SKUs. B-grade is the next 15% of revenue, roughly 25 to 35% of SKUs. C-grade is the bottom 5% of revenue, which usually balloons out to 40 to 60% of your catalogue. That C-grade band is where rationalisation lives.

A few rules when you pull the report. Use a 12-month window, not 90 days. Seasonal stores get punished by short windows. Run it by product variant, not by parent product, because a “navy XL” tells you something different to a “rose XS”. And export the CSV. You will need it for Tier 2 because ABC alone is necessary but never sufficient. Revenue tells you what sold. It does not tell you what was profitable, what was strategic, or what was just floating on heavy discounting.

For most Aussie stores between $40K and $500K a month in revenue, the first ABC pull reveals something uncomfortable. Roughly half the catalogue is in C-grade. A third of A-grade revenue is concentrated in five to ten variants. The hero range you thought was performing has two real winners and twelve passengers. The audit has not even started yet and you already know where the cuts are coming from.

Tier 2: The 5-Metric SKU Scoreboard (What ABC Misses)

ABC by itself will get you a punishing cut list, but it will also flag SKUs that should not be cut. Revenue is one input. You need four more before you make any irreversible decision.

Put all five into one sheet next to every variant and you have a scoreboard. The reason this matters: a low-revenue SKU with a 55% contribution margin and a sell-through of 2x per year is a hidden gem, not a cut candidate. A high-revenue SKU with a 9% margin and a 1.2x sell-through is a margin trap, not a hero. ABC would tell you to keep the latter and quietly bury the former. The scoreboard tells you the opposite.

SKU portfolio scoreboard table showing revenue, contribution margin, sell-through, days of cover and decision tiers
The 5-metric SKU scoreboard. A single sheet that turns 247 SKUs into 84 cut candidates and a $58,420 cash recovery plan.

Tier 3: The Decision Matrix (Keep, Promote, Reprice, Liquidate, Discontinue)

Once you have the scoreboard, every SKU gets one of five labels. The decision matrix below is what we use inside eCommerce Circle to remove the emotion from cuts. You are not deciding “is this a good product”. You are deciding “what is the right action for this product right now”.

The decision is rarely fifty-fifty. About 70% of C-grade SKUs in a typical first audit fall cleanly into LIQUIDATE or DISCONTINUE. Another 20% turn out to be hidden gems flagged for PROMOTE. The last 10% are the genuinely tough calls: a slow-moving SKU that a top customer specifically buys, a colour that drives a key collaboration, or a variant that supports a wholesale account. Those get a conditional KEEP with a 90-day review.

SKU decision matrix quadrant chart plotting contribution margin against revenue with keep promote reprice liquidate discontinue tiers
The 2×2 view of the same data. Revenue on the X-axis, contribution margin on the Y-axis. Every SKU lands in one of five action tiers.

Tier 4: The Liquidation Playbook (5 Channels to Clear C-Grade Stock)

This is where most Aussie founders stall. They run the audit, draw up the cut list, and then the C-grade stock sits there for another 18 months because nobody has a written plan for actually moving it. The point of rationalisation is to free up the cash. Stock that is “going to be cut” but still in your warehouse is just dead stock with a story.

The order matters. Try Channel 1 and 2 first because they protect margin. Channel 3 keeps revenue flowing but discounts permanently. Channels 4 and 5 are emergency exits. The 60-day target is non-negotiable: if a SKU is on the cut list and has not moved through one of these five channels in 60 days, it goes to Channel 4 by default.

Tier 5: The Discontinuation SOP (Removing a SKU Without Killing SEO or CX)

Cutting a SKU in Shopify is not “click delete”. A clean discontinuation protects SEO equity, avoids angry customer service tickets, and keeps your reporting clean. We use a 7-step SOP every time, no exceptions.

Run this SOP for every discontinued SKU. Most stores will find that the URL redirect alone reclaims 5 to 15% of the SEO traffic that would otherwise vanish, and customer service tickets about “where is product X” drop to near zero within 30 days.

The Compound Effect: What Founders See 90 Days After a Rationalisation

The reason this audit pays back faster than almost any other operating exercise is that the gains stack. You do not get one benefit. You get five at once and they reinforce each other.

First, cash. A typical Aussie brand running its first SKU audit on a 200-SKU catalogue will free up $40,000 to $80,000 in trapped inventory cash through liquidation channels 1 to 4. That cash goes straight onto the next hero reorder, which compounds because hero SKUs sell through 4 to 8 times faster than C-grade. If you have not yet mapped the working capital benefit, the Shopify Cash Conversion Cycle Playbook shows how this rolls into the broader cycle.

Second, margin. McKinsey case data on CPG simplification programmes shows 3 to 6 percentage points of margin lift even as SKU counts fall 25%. The same math holds in DTC. Cutting a 9% margin SKU and replacing the shelf space with a 45% margin SKU is a 36-point swing on every unit sold, before you even count the reduction in overhead.

Third, conversion. Fewer SKUs on the collection page means less decision fatigue. Choice overload research consistently shows 15 to 25% conversion lifts when a category drops from 30 options to 12. Aussie brands that have run this with us report similar movement, sometimes more on mobile where scroll depth is the silent killer.

Fourth, forecasting accuracy. Going from 240 SKUs to 160 does not just save admin time. Demand planning gets easier because you are planning around stronger signal. The four-times accuracy gap between SKU-level and category-level forecasts narrows as your tail thins. Better forecasts mean fewer stockouts on the heroes, which is where real revenue lives. The Back-in-Stock Playbook covers the stockout recovery side.

Fifth, focus. The least quantifiable, most under-rated benefit. A founder with 80 SKUs to obsess over thinks about positioning, photography, and customer experience. A founder with 240 SKUs thinks about inventory and admin. The cut is a strategic act, not just a financial one.

The 5-Tier SKU Audit Template (Your EOFY Checklist)

Pull this exercise into 5 days between now and 30 June. One tier per day. You do not need a consultant, an enterprise data warehouse, or new software. You need your Shopify admin, a spreadsheet, and the discipline to follow the order.

Run this every six months. Plenty of Aussie brands run it quarterly once they have done it once because the discipline pays. The cuts get smaller each cycle because the catalogue stays disciplined, but the cash freed and the margin lifted compound. By the second year of running this rhythm, the only SKUs that survive are the ones earning their place.

If you have not run this audit, your catalogue has 30 to 40% dead weight inside it right now. EOFY is the cleanest window of the year to cut it because the discounting is expected, the tax position favours clearing stock, and the new financial year starts with cash on the balance sheet instead of dust on the shelves. Inside eCommerce Circle, the SKU rationalisation audit is one of the first exercises we run with every new member because it pays for the membership three times over before BFCM. If you want a second opinion on yours, let’s talk.

The Shopify SKU Rationalisation Playbook: The 5-Tier Portfolio Audit Aussie DTC Founders Use to Cut 30 to 40% of Underperforming Products (and Reclaim $50K+ in Trapped Inventory Cash Before EOFY)
Team eCommerce Circle

Written by

Team eCommerce Circle

Helping Shopify brand owners scale smarter through the eCommerce Circle coaching community.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank You

Your application for the eCommerce Circle was successfully submitted.
We’ll get back to you through your provided details shortly.

Thank You

Your enrolment was successfully submitted, and we’ve added you to the waitlist for your preferred cohort.

Not a Circle Member Yet?
Only members can join cohorts!
Join here.